Sacrificing Our TODAY for the World's TOMORROW
FATA is "Federally Administered Tribal Area" of Pakistan; consisting of 7 Agencies and 6 F.Rs; with a 27000 Sq Km area and 4.5 m population.
MYTH: FATA is the HUB of militancy, terrorism and unrest in Afghanistan.
REALITY: FATA is the worst "VICTIM of Militancy”. Thousands of Civilians dead & injured; Hundreds of Schools destroyed; Thousands of homes raised to ground; 40% population displaced from homes.
Showing posts with label EconomyBusiness. Show all posts
Showing posts with label EconomyBusiness. Show all posts

Saturday, June 4, 2011

Pakistan Budget 2011-2012: وفاقی بجٹ 12-2011 کے اہم نکات

 بی بی سی اردو ڈاٹ کام :Courtesy

وفاقی بجٹ 12-2011 کے اہم نکات

مالی سال سنہ 12 - 2011 کے لیے پاکستان کا وفاقی بجٹ تین جون کو پیش کر دیا گیا ہے۔ ذیل میں اس بجٹ کے اہم نکات دیے جا رہے ہیں۔

تنخواہیں اور پنشن

٭یکم جولائی سنہ 2002 سےریٹائر ہونے والے سرکاری ملازمین کی پنشن میں پندرہ فیصد جبکہ اس سے قبل ریٹائر ہونے والوں کی پنشن میں بیس فیصد کا اضافے کی تجویز ہے۔
٭گریڈ ایک سے پندرہ کے سرکاری ملازمین کو جولائی سنہ دوہزار نو تک دیے گئے ایڈہاک ریلیف الاؤنس کو یکم جولائی دو ہزار آٹھ کے بنیادی پے سکیل میں ضم کردیے جانے کی تجویز ہے، جس کے بعد نئے پے سکیل بنائے جائیں گے۔

Friday, June 3, 2011

Pakistan Federal Budget 2011-2012: Salient points of Budget 2011 (Express Tribune, 3 June 2011)

Courtesy: Daily "Express Tribune, Pakistan", 3 June 2011 
Finance Minister presents Budget 2011-12 amidst chaos
By Atika Rehman / Jahanzaib Haque / Reuters / Shaheryar Popalzai
ISLAMABAD: The federal government has announced the budget for the fiscal year 2011-12 with an outlay of Rs 2.767 trillion.
Finance minister Hafeez Shaikh presented the budget amidst sloganeering from the opposition benches.
Salient features of the budget:
- The 2011/12 budget outlay is 2.767 trillion rupees ($32 billion), up 14.2 percent from the 2010/11 fiscal year, even though he had earlier quoted the outlay at 2.504 trillion rupees in the budget speech.
- The budget targets a fiscal deficit of 4 percent of gross domestic     product (GDP) for 2011/12.
- GDP growth is targeted at 4.2 percent.
- Aim to contain inflation at 12 percent.
- Reduction of the general sales tax (GST) to 16 percent from 17   percent.

Sunday, May 29, 2011

UNICEF discloses vaccine prices charged by Drugmakers for 1st time (Associated Press, 28 May 2011)

Courtesy: "Associated Press (AP)", 28 May 2011
UNICEF discloses vaccine prices for 1st time

UNICEF is for the first time publicizing what drugmakers charge it for vaccines, as the world's biggest buyer of lifesaving immunizations aims to spark price competition in the face of rising costs.
On Friday, UNICEF posted on its website the actual prices that it has paid individual drugmakers for 16 vaccines purchased over the last decade. It's a move that a few Western pharmaceutical companies don't support. Novartis AG and Merck & Co., which only sells one of its many children's vaccines to UNICEF, both declined to have their prices published.
UNICEF said it will continue to disclose pricing of future vaccine deals, with the hope that the transparency will push drugmakers to cut prices and thus allow the organization to vaccinate more children and save more lives.

Saturday, May 28, 2011

Wireless Ink Corp's claim stands: Google, Facebook lose social network patent ruling (Reuters, 27 May 2011)

Courtesy: "Reuters", 27 May 2011
Google, Facebook lose social network patent ruling

CHICAGO
(Reuters) - Google Inc and Facebook Inc failed to win dismissal of a lawsuit by a New York company related to software designed to let people take part on social networks through their mobile phones.
Wireless Ink Corp, which runs the Winksite service, may pursue claims that Google Buzz and Facebook Mobile infringed its October 2009 patent, U.S. District Judge Kevin Castel in Manhattan wrote in a ruling made public on Friday.
The patent related to a method to help novice mobile phone users create mobile websites that other phone users can see. Wireless Ink is seeking a halt to the alleged infringement, and compensatory and triple damages.

Paypal sues Google over its plans to launch smartphone pay service (Associated Press, 27 May 2011)

Courtesy: "Associated Press (AP)", 27 May 2011
Google unveils smartphone pay service, PayPal sues

NEW YORK (AP) -- Google Inc. hopes to nudge consumers and merchants into a world where the smartphone has replaced the wallet as the container for credit cards, coupons and receipts.
While it tackles that challenge, Google also will have to spar with the biggest online payment service, eBay Inc.'s PayPal, in a legal battle that could be filled with corporate intrigue.
After Google unveiled its tap-to-pay technology in New York on a smartphone equipped with its Android software, PayPal struck back in a California court with a lawsuit alleging the service is the byproduct of intellectual theft and betrayal.
The central figure in the 28-page complaint is Osama Bedier, now Google's vice president of payments after spending nine years at PayPal. He was part of the team that showed off a new service called "Google Wallet."

Monday, May 16, 2011

Washington hits "Debt Ceiling": U.S has 11 Weeks to avoid Default (WSJ, 16 May 2011)

Courtesy: "Wall Street Journal (WSJ)", 16 May 2011
As Debt Limit Reached, Agreement Still Far Off
By DAMIAN PALETTA And CAROL E. LEE
The U.S. government is expected to hit the $14.294 trillion debt ceiling Monday, setting in motion an uncertain, 11-week political scramble to avoid a default.
The Treasury Department plans to announce Monday it will stop issuing and reinvesting government securities in certain government pension plans, part of a series of steps designed to delay a default until Aug. 2.
The Treasury's moves buy time for the White House and congressional leaders to reach a deficit-reduction agreement that could clear the way for enough lawmakers to vote to raise the amount of money Congress allows the nation to borrow.
Gene Sperling, director of the National Economic Council, said reaching the debt ceiling "should be a warning bell to the political system that it's time to get serious about preserving our full faith and credit." The Obama administration says a default would tip the U.S. back into a financial crisis.

But the pathway to a deal remains unclear, even to those doing the negotiating. The White House and Republicans are giving conflicting signals about how close they are to a deal. Vice President Joe Biden said last week the contours of an agreement were taking shape. House Speaker John Boehner painted a different picture Sunday, saying on CBS's Face the Nation "I'm not seeing any real action."
Many Republicans and some Democrats have said they won't vote to increase the debt ceiling without an accompanying deal to cut spending or tackle such longer-term fiscal problems as health-care costs. They argue the debt ceiling is a good venue to force changes needed to help secure the nation's solvency.
People familiar with the negotiations led by Mr. Biden say they are looking at cuts to agriculture subsidies and federal retirement programs, stepped-up antifraud efforts, increased premiums for pension plans backed by the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation and the sale of wireless spectrum and government properties.
The talks are at an early stage and potential areas of agreement are preliminary, officials warn. But Democrats have not ruled out some thorny issues, according to people familiar with the negotiations, including reforms to the pension program for federal workers.
The areas being examined amount to a sliver of the $4 trillion goal officials have set for deficit reduction over the next 10 years.
And taxes remain a roadblock. Republican leaders say tax increases can't be part of any deficit plan, but White House officials have said any plan must include revenue increases.
Mr. Sperling said the White House wants an agreement "weeks in advance as opposed to being in stalemate in late July where everything is coming down to the wire." Mr. Boehner appeared to agree, saying Sunday a deal doesn't "have to wait until the eleventh hour."
A group of House Republicans has questioned the validity of the August deadline, suggesting the Treasury could sell assets, such as gold reserves, to keep paying creditors. Treasury officials have rejected the idea, but could be forced to rethink if talks stall.
The U.S. government has hit the debt ceiling before, most notably in 1995 and 1996 when the Clinton administration and House Republicans squared off over government spending. Eventually, though, lawmakers reached deals and the country hasn't defaulted on its debt in modern history.
Bankers and business executives warned lawmakers last week that default could trigger a financial crisis, sending interest rates soaring, which would make it harder for families and businesses to borrow. That's because a default would throw into question the value of U.S. Treasury securities, long considered one of the world's safest investments. Many loans and business deals are based on the value of Treasurys, and if their value eroded the impact would be felt broadly.
Because the government is projected to run a $1.5 trillion deficit this year, it must borrow money to cover its obligations, ranging from military spending to interest on existing debt.
Lawmakers have not felt pressure to act yet in part because markets have remained stable, and the yield for U.S. government debt remains low.
Yields on 10-year Treasury notes have fallen from more than 3.7% in early February—when Fed officials and others began warning of catastrophic consequences if the debt limit was breached—to below 3.2%.
If investors had serious concerns about a default, they likely would be selling bonds, which would in turn push up their yields. Bond yields have instead been moving down in part because the economy seems to be slowing. Commodities prices also have tumbled, which holds down inflation and puts downward pressure on bond yields.
If officials get too close to Aug. 2, government officials might have to decide which of the country's creditors to pay and which payments they will suspend or stop.
Treasury officials so far have deflected questions about which creditors would be given priority. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said in a letter to Sen. Michael Bennet (D., Colo.) last week that failing to raise the debt ceiling would lead to a default on obligations "such as payments to our service members, citizens, investors, and businesses."

—Jon Hilsenrath and Naftali Bendavid contributed to this article.....................

Note: The viewpoint expressed in this article is solely that of the writer / news outlet. "FATA Awareness Initiative" Team may not agree with the opinion presented.
....................

We Hope You find the info useful. Keep visiting this blog and remember to leave your feedback / comments / suggestions / requests / corrections.
With Regards,
"FATA Awareness Initiative" Team.

Greece Reality Check: Euro Crisis Worsens as EU Leaders Play for Time (Spiegel International , 16 May 2011)

Courtesy: "Spiegel International, Germany", 16 May 2011
Greece Reality Check
Euro Crisis Worsens as EU Leaders Play for Time
By SPIEGEL Staff
Europe's leaders are still opposing a Greek debt restructuring, and they are exacerbating the euro crisis as a result. The Greek economy is at risk of collapse and resistance to further loans for the troubled nation is mounting. The continent urgently needs a new bailout plan.The formal act was quickly settled, but German Finance Minister had no time to celebrate. The members of the budget committee in the German parliament, the Bundestag, had hardly given their blessing to billions in new aid for ailing Portugal last Wednesday before parliamentarians were drilling the finance minister with questions about the next troublespot -- Greece.

The lawmakers wanted to know more about the secret meeting held the previous Friday, which had been reported by SPIEGEL ONLINE and which top European politicians were still denying as their limousines were pulling up to the Château de Senningen in Luxembourg. Was it true that Greece needs billions more in financial assistance? More importantly, the parliamentarians wanted Schäuble to elaborate on reports that Greece is insolvent and that the government in Athens has already considered withdrawing from the monetary union.
In his lengthy response to their questions, the minister denied the reports, explained the turf battles during the negotiations in Brussels and asked the parliamentarians to remain patient until an international panel of experts had thoroughly assessed the situation in the country. "For now, we're going to wait until the results of the report are out in July. Then we'll see what happens next."
As they play down the issue, try to appease critics and play for time, Germany's finance minister and his European counterparts are determined to keep on denying reality in the struggle to rescue the common currency.
More than a year ago, they created a €110 billion ($157 billion) bailout fund for Greece. Since then, however, the likelihood of a government bankruptcy has only increased. The country's mountain of debts is growing, the economy is at risk of collapsing and the promised austerity programs are not progressing as planned.
Restructuring 'Out of the Question' -- For Now
As a result, economists and financial experts have long agreed that forgiving a large share of Greece's debts will be unavoidable. European leaders, however, seem to be resorting to denial and faith healing instead.
"A restructuring of Greek debts is absolutely out of the question," says French Finance Minister Christine Lagarde, while Schäuble notes: "A debt restructuring is not under consideration and is completely speculative."
Instead, the European Commission intends to fight the crisis with new debts, even though government officials in European capitals are still denying this, as usual. There is talk of a €60-billion loan package, additional austerity programs and even tougher austerity.
If the medicine isn't working, increase the dose. That, at least, is the treatment plan being pursued by the saviors of the euro in Brussels. A new austerity and loan program would not only increase Greece's debt and curb the economy even further. It would also stigmatize Greece as Europe's stepchild for decades to come, dependent on the goodwill of the lender nations, governed by the inspectors of the European Commission, the European Central Bank (ECB) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF), a prospect London's Financial Times describes as a "political nightmare."
It would also worsen public antipathy towards the EU. Anti-EU parties are on the rise throughout the bloc, and beleaguered governments from Copenhagen to Rome have no better solution than to fight back with narrow-minded nationalism.
The Libyan crisis is a case in point. Germany initially opposed its allies, France and Great Britain, and then Rome and Paris squabbled over what to do with refugees from North Africa. Last week, the Danish government introduced border controls that may be in violation of European treaties.
Merkel May Face Party Rebellion Over New Loans
A new bailout program for Greece would poison the political climate, including the one within Berlin's coalition government. For weeks, lawmakers from Chancellor Angela Merkel's coalition of conservatives and pro-business Free Democrats (FDP) have voiced their concerns over Europe's strategy in the euro crisis. Now the prospect of even more billions for Greece is fueling their resistance.
If the coalition is forced to vote on new euro aid after the summer recess, Merkel's parliamentary majority will be in jeopardy. Government officials say Merkel may even have to call a vote of confidence to get the funding approved.
Still, it is becoming clear to most European governments that the bailout programs for Greece cannot continue in their current form. For weeks, European finance ministers have been debating possible alternatives.
At the secret meeting on Friday, May 6, the finance ministers from the large euro countries, ECB President Jean-Claude Trichet and Eurogroup President Jean-Claude Juncker convened at the Luxembourg government conference center to discuss the increasingly ominous situation in Greece.
Greek Finance Minister Giorgos Papakonstantinou was also invited. His counterparts had intended to put him back on track, because the Greeks had recently failed to fulfill the internationally imposed austerity requirements.
'Lack of Linguistic Discipline'
The meeting was intended as a forum for issues that the players would normally hardly dare to mention in so much as a whisper. Schäuble had come well prepared. His 150-page folder of talking points included an analysis of the Greek debt situation and a study on additional privatization options, as well as documents on a restructuring of the Greek national debt. The most explosive document was described in the table of contents as follows: "German Background Document: Greece's Withdrawal from the Monetary Union."
When SPIEGEL ONLINE reported on the meeting and quoted from the document, it was Schäuble who suddenly found himself in the dock rather than his Greek counterpart. The other finance ministers accused him of lacking control over his staff. "We are surprised by the lack of linguistic discipline in Germany," one participant complained afterwards. "This isn't the first time that information from Germany has caused problems."
The scenario is by no means an invention by finance ministry officials in Berlin, who, in writing the document, were merely reacting to considerations in Athens, as SPIEGEL learned last week. According to sources within the European Commission in Brussels, the government of Prime Minister Georgios Papandreou had already reviewed the pros and cons of withdrawing from the euro zone some time ago.
The plan is now off the table, and the issue of a debt restructuring was also no longer relevant at the meeting, at least not for the time being. There was too great a fear of upsetting the markets even further, after the news of the secret meeting had been leaked.
Athens Seeking Better Loan Terms
Instead, Athens asked for better terms. It argued that the debt burden could be made more tolerable if the interest rates were reduced once again and the periods of the bailout loans were extended.
The representatives from the donor nations responded coolly to the idea. New concessions, they said, would only be an option if the Greek government tightened its reform efforts even further, despite strikes and mass demonstrations. First Greece would have to sell off additional government assets and thereby raise up to €50 billion. Because the program is not making any headway, Schäuble is already thinking of sending privatization experts from his ministry to Athens as advisors.

The participants spent hour after hour arguing, so that by the end of the meeting they were only able to agree to stick to the current bailout program: No reduction in the Greek debt, but possibly new loans in return for additional austerity requirements. Meanwhile, the currency crisis continues to smolder. But hardly anyone believes anymore that Greece can avoid a restructuring, or a debt haircut. Its mountain of debts has grown to more than 150 percent of gross domestic product this year. Meanwhile, the economy is shrinking, partly because of the austerity measures.
The country is stuck in a vicious circle. Investors refuse to lend Greece money at affordable interest rates because they are convinced that Greece is over-indebted. This forces the government to accept bailout loans from its partner countries, which further increases debt levels while reducing creditworthiness.
No Alternative to More Credit for Athens
If the governments continue to refuse to agree to a debt haircut, Greece will need new help from its partners by next year at the latest. Last Monday, Schäuble told the CDU's executive board that he planned to "stand firm" against such plans for the time being. But in the end, he added, there would be no alternative but to approve additional billions in loans to Athens.
The reason: Without new liquidity injections, the Greeks will have no access to scheduled funds from the IMF, which can only pay out the next tranche from its bailout package if the country can demonstrate that it can service its debts in the coming 12 months.
A joint team from the IMF, ECB and European Commission is currently scrutinizing the progress of the Greek austerity program, but it is already clear that the Greeks are not likely to fulfill the requirements.
Not surprisingly, the mood is tense. Despite all the negative reports, Chancellor Merkel intends to wait until the experts who are now reviewing the situation in Athens have compiled their report. For this reason, she angrily informed European Commission President José Manuel Barroso during his visit to Berlin last Wednesday that she considers the talk in Brussels of new billions in aid to be more than premature.
Meanwhile, a feeling of resignation is taking hold in Greece. When Prime Minister Papandreou announced his rigorous austerity and restructuring program a year ago, he was still confident of having the support of a majority of the population. For many Greeks, the crisis was even an opportunity to finally put an end to an economy that had been based on debt and privileges for decades.
Some Greeks Warming to Idea of Euro Withdrawal
But now large segments of the population favor a quick fix, like the one Vassilis Sarantopoulos, 50, the head of a small Greek publishing company, recommends. The "solution" to Greece's debt crisis is obvious, says Sarantopoulos: "Withdrawal from the euro zone, return to the drachma, non-recognition of the government debt."
This, he says, could "help everyone, Greece and Europe alike."
Sarantopoulos is sitting in Café Kastro in a suburb in northeast Athens, savoring the silent admiration of his friends. He is one of the advocates of a new movement in Greece called "I Won't Pay." The name speaks for itself.
Its members are refusing to pay the price for the crisis. They are hampering the operation of tollbooths on the expressway, taping over coin slots on ticket machines for buses and trains or simply dodging fares. They plan to call for resistance to a patient fee for visiting doctors and they want to organize a tax boycott. The movement already has at least 10,000 members, its organizers claim, noting that "a new committee is added" every day.
A new rage is erupting at the foot of the Acropolis. It includes a few young anarchists, who marched through the streets of Athens throwing stones last week. But most members of the "I Won't Pay" movement are ordinary middle-class people or the unemployed.
They believe that politicians and bankers caused the crisis and should therefore solve it. "This is your crisis, not our crisis," their slogan reads. According to opinion polls, 26 percent of Greeks are now opposed to the European bailout funds.
In the government too, the front opposing a national bankruptcy is crumbling. Former Environment Minister Vasso Papandreou is now openly criticizing her fellow member of the Panhellenic Socialist Movement, or PASOK, Finance Minister Papakonstantinou, saying that he "has no overall plan."
Mimis Androulakis, also a member of PASOK, says that his own government is pursuing an "erroneous treatment concept." And Petros Economou, a fellow member of the PASOK parliamentary group, even believes that the austerity measures have in fact exacerbated the Greek debt problem.
Greek EU Commissioner Maria Damanaki, however, is appealing to her fellow Socialists in the Athens government to tighten reforms even further. "Without radical reforms for a leaner, cheaper and better functioning government, Greece will never see light at the end of the tunnel."
Loss of Faith in Bailout Strategy
Many in the European lender nations, including Germany, are beginning to lose faith in the current bailout strategy. Last Tuesday, displeasure within the CDU/CSU parliamentary group became apparent when CSU parliamentary Peter Gauweiler ridiculed the German government's approach, saying: "The energy concept, the euro rescue -- now we can put everything we decided on last year in a box and write on it: not applicable."
There is growing distrust, particularly toward the so-called European Stability Mechanism (ESM), with which Europe plans to support other crisis-ridden countries like Portugal and Ireland in the future. "The depressing news from Greece shows that the current approach to rescuing the euro isn't working," says CDU parliamentarian Marco Wanderwitz. "This doesn't make approval of the ESM any easier."
Without a sustainable solution for Greece, the other bailout funds won't work
either, says Thomas Silberhorn, a European expert with the CSU. "There is no getting around a debt restructuring for Greece."
Gerda Hasselfeldt, the new head of the CSU parliamentary group, is also distancing herself from the current Greece strategy. First it will have to be determined whether Athens has complied with the requirements of the stability program, she says. "If the requirements are not met, no funds will be disbursed."
Schäuble's notorious secretiveness is also causing problems. Last week Gunther Krichbaum (CDU), the chairman of the Committee on European Affairs in Germany's parliament, the Bundestag, complained in a letter to Schäuble that parliamentarians had not been given a current version of the ESM treaty. It was "unacceptable," he wrote, that the Bundestag members "have had to ask their Austrian counterparts for copies of the various drafts."
The growing dissatisfaction within the coalition isn't just jeopardizing the future ESM crisis mechanism, but also the government itself. The number of euro skeptics within the coalition's junior partner, the FDP, is far greater than in the CDU/CSU. In the last few weeks, 14 FDP politicians have already announced their intention to vote against the ESM. If only seven CDU/CSU parliamentarians were to join them, the government would no longer have a majority and would be require the opposition's approval -- spelling complete humiliation for the chancellor.
Backup Plan
The risk of this happening is so great that the leaders of Berlin's coalition government are now prepared to make concessions. Finance Minister Schäuble, for example, proposes giving parliamentarians a greater say in decisions related to future ESM loans.
And in the case of Greece, his officials have come up with a backup bailout plan that makes at least some allowances for the gloomy realities. Under that plan, the European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF) would approve a loan for Greece. The Greek government could use the money to buy up old bonds still on the market, which are currently trading at about 60 percent of their face value. The operation would be worthwhile for Athens, because the EFSF charges lower interest than the market and offers a more favorable repayment period.
The deal would also offer advantages for the bond issuers. They would still receive 60 percent for their old bonds, which would probably be more than they would get in the case of a severe debt haircut.
Last week, a senior representative of the German Finance Ministry indicated tentative support for this solution in a meeting with the financial experts of the coalition parliamentary groups. "There are economic reasons to suggest that such an instrument could make sense," he said. But he also pointed out that a large-scale repurchase program could not receive majority approval within the coalition or in Europe at the moment.
It would be a step in the right direction, albeit a hesitant one. Hendrik Enderlein, a professor at the Hertie School of Governance in Berlin, is now convinced that Athens needs forgiveness of "at least 50 to 60 percent of its debts," but adds: "This cannot be achieved by extending loan periods or with repurchase programs."
Oxford economist Clemens Fuest agrees. "Europe's governments must face reality," says Fuest, a member of the Academic Advisory Board at the German Finance Ministry. According to Fuest, Europe cannot "keep behaving as if Greece were not insolvent, while constantly imposing new burdens on taxpayers for the bailout."
Schäuble's predecessor has agreed with the economists' insights for some time. "The question is no longer whether Greece will restructure its debt," says former Finance Minister Peer Steinbrück, a member of the center-left Social Democratic Party (SPD), "but when."
MANFRED ERTEL, PETER MÜLLER, CHRISTIAN REIERMANN, MICHAEL SAUGA, CHRISTOPH SCHULT
Translated from the German by Christopher Sultan.
....................

Note: The viewpoint expressed in this article is solely that of the writer / news outlet. "FATA Awareness Initiative" Team may not agree with the opinion presented.
....................

We Hope You find the info useful. Keep visiting this blog and remember to leave your feedback / comments / suggestions / requests / corrections.
With Regards,
"FATA Awareness Initiative" Team.

Sunday, May 15, 2011

NY police question IMF head Dominique Strauss-Kahn in hotel sex assault (Associated Press)

Courtesy: "Associated Press (AP)", 15 May 2011
NY police question IMF head in hotel sex assault

NEW YORK (AP) -- The leader of the International Monetary Fund and a possible candidate for president of France was pulled from an airplane moments before he was to fly to Paris and was being questioned Saturday by police in connection with the violent sexual assault of a hotel maid, police said.
Dominique Strauss-Kahn was taken off the Air France flight at John F. Kennedy International Airport by officers from the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey and turned over to police Saturday afternoon, said Paul J. Browne, New York Police Department spokesman.
He was being questioned by the NYPD special victims office. Strauss-Kahn had retained an attorney and was not making statements to police, Browne said.
"He's being arrested for a criminal sex act, attempted rape and unlawful imprisonment," Browne said.

The 32-year-old woman told authorities that she entered Strauss-Kahn's suite at the luxury Sofitel hotel not far from Manhattan's Times Square at about 1 p.m. Eastern time (1600 GMT) Saturday and he attacked her, Browne said. She said she had been told to clean the spacious $3000-a-night-suite suite, which she had been told was empty.
According to an account the woman provided to police, Strauss-Kahn emerged from the bathroom naked, chased her down a hallway and pulled her into a bedroom, where he began to sexually assault her. She said she fought him off, then he dragged her into the bathroom, where he forced her to perform oral sex on him and tried to remove her underwear. The woman was able to break free again and escaped the room and told hotel staff what had happened, authorities said. They called police.
When New York City police detectives arrived moments later, Strauss-Kahn had already left the hotel, leaving behind his cellphone, Browne said. "It looked like he got out of there in a hurry," Browne said.
The NYPD discovered that he was at the airport and contacted Port Authority officials, who plucked Kahn from first class on the Air France flight that was scheduled to depart at 4:40 p.m. and was just about to leave the gate.
The maid was taken by police to a hospital and being treated for minor injuries. John Sheehan, a spokesman for the hotel, said its staff was cooperating in the investigation.
Strauss-Kahn was briefly investigated in 2008 over whether he had an improper relationship with a subordinate female employee. The IMF board found his actions "regrettable" and said they "reflected a serious error of judgment."
William Murray, a spokesman for the IMF in Washington, said the IMF had no immediate comment. Strauss-Kahn's offices in Paris couldn't be reached when the news broke overnight in France, nor could French Socialist Party officials.
He was supposed to be meeting in Berlin on Sunday with German Chancellor Angela Merkel about aid to debt-laden Greece, and then join EU finance ministers in Brussels on Monday and Tuesday. The IMF is responsible for one-third of Greece's existing loan package, and his expected presence at these meetings underlined the gravity of the Greek crisis.
Strauss-Kahn took over as head of the IMF in November 2007. The 187-nation lending agency is headquartered in Washington and provides help in the form of emergency loans for countries facing severe financial problems.
Strauss-Kahn won praise for his leadership at the IMF during the financial crisis of 2008 and the severe global recession that followed.
More recently, he has directed the IMF's participation in bailout efforts to keep a European debt crisis which began in Greece from destabilizing the global economy.
In October 2008, Strauss-Kahn issued an apology to the IMF staff after accusations that he had a sexual relationship with an IMF subordinate.
"While this incident constituted an error in judgment on my part, for which I take full responsibility, I firmly believe that I have not abused my position," Strauss-Kahn wrote in an email to IMF staff.
The board found that the relationship was consensual. The IMF employee left the fund and took a job with the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
Before taking the top post at the IMF, Strauss-Kahn had been a member of the French National Assembly and had also served as France's Minister of Economy, Finance and Industry from June 1997 to November 1999.
He had been viewed as a leading contender to run on the Socialist Party's ticket to challenge the re-election of French President Nicolas Sarkozy.
Strauss-Kahn, dubbed DSK in France, was seen as the strongest possible challenger to Sarkozy in next year's presidential elections. Strauss-Kahn has not declared his candidacy, staying vague in interviews while feeding speculation that he wants France's top job.
The New York accusations come amid French media reports about Strauss-Kahn's lifestyle, including luxury cars and suits, that some have dubbed a smear campaign.
He sought the Socialist Party's endorsement in the last elections, in 2007, but came in second in a primary to Segolene Royal. Royal, the first woman to get so close to France's presidency, lost to Sarkozy in the runoff.
After Sarkozy won, the new president championed Strauss-Kahn as a candidate to run the IMF. Sarkozy's backers touted the move as a sign of the conservative president's campaign of openness to leftists - but political strategists saw it as a way for Sarkozy to get a potential challenger far away from the French limelight.
The global financial crisis thrust Strauss-Kahn into an unexpectedly prominent role and boosted his global standing in time to consider a 2012 French presidential bid.
He is credited with preparing France for the adoption of the euro by taming its deficit and persuading then-Prime Minister Lionel Jospin to sign up to an EU pact of fiscal prudence.
A former economics professor, Strauss-Kahn joined the Socialist party in 1976 and was elected to parliament in 1986 from the Val-d'Oise district, north of Paris. He went on to become mayor of Sarcelles, a working-class immigrant suburb of Paris.
His first government post was industry minister under former President Francois Mitterrand. As finance minister, he reduced France's debt repayments through a raft of privatizations including the sale of shares in France Telecom SA and Air France.
Strauss-Kahn is a married father of four. His third wife, Anne Sinclair, is a New York-born journalist who hosted a popular weekly news broadcast in France in the 1980s.
A security guard stood watch outside the Sofitel near busy Times Square on Saturday night, keeping everyone but guests out of the building.
---
Associated Press writers Cristian Salazar in New York, Martin Crutsinger in Washington and Angela Charlton in Paris contributed to this report.


....................

Note: The viewpoint expressed in this article is solely that of the writer / news outlet. "FATA Awareness Initiative" Team may not agree with the opinion presented.
....................

We Hope You find the info useful. Keep visiting this blog and remember to leave your feedback / comments / suggestions / requests / corrections.
With Regards,
"FATA Awareness Initiative" Team.

Saturday, May 14, 2011

Facebook-Google rivalry intensifies with PR fiasco (Associated Press, 12 May 2011)

Courtesy: "Associated Press", 12 May 2011
Facebook-Google rivalry intensifies with PR fiasco

NEW YORK (AP) -- The intense rivalry between Facebook and Google just got juicier.
In a twist seemingly out of a Hollywood thriller, Facebook hired a prominent public relations firm to try to plant stories harshly criticizing Google's privacy practices in leading news outlets. The efforts backfired when the firm approached a blogger who not only declined the assignment, but also went public with the offer.
The latest Silicon Valley drama has also evoked chatter of smear campaigns, secrecy and even Richard Nixon. It took the once-secret blogger known as Fake Steve Jobs to help sort it all out.
One lesson: If you're going to write an incriminating email, don't. Pick up the phone instead.
Here's another:
"If you are out there planting negative stories, you are feeding the conflict," said Larry L. Smith, president of the Institute for Crisis Management, a public relations company. "When they get in a shoving match, whoever is perceived by the public to be the bully loses in the public eye."

Rather than getting news outlets to circulate stories about privacy problems facing Google, Facebook found itself having to answer questions about why it wanted to maintain secrecy.
Facebook said it never authorized or intended to run any smear campaign against Google. Rather, the company said it hired Burson-Marsteller to prompt investigations into how a new Google service called Social Circle collects and uses data about people. In a statement, Facebook said it should have made it clear that it was behind the efforts.
Burson-Marsteller said Facebook had requested that its identity remain secret "on the grounds that it was merely asking to bring publicly available information to light." The firm said that violated its own policies, "and the assignment on those terms should have been declined."
Not that it was.
Facebook's efforts to stay anonymous - something that violates the terms of service for users of its site - began to unravel when Burson-Marsteller contacted blogger Christopher Soghoian, an Indiana University graduate student well known in online privacy and security circles.
The firm's John Mercurio asked Soghoian if he wanted to write an item for "a top-tier media outlet" blasting Google for what Mercurio calls a "sweeping violation of user privacy." Soghoian asked for the identity of the firm's client, but Mercurio wouldn't reveal it. Soghoian then posted the email exchange online.
Burson-Marsteller, meanwhile, also pitched USA Today. Instead of running with the planted story, USA Today published an article on the "PR firm's attack of Gmail privacy."
It took Newsweek tech editor Dan Lyons to figure out that Burson-Marsteller's mystery client was not Apple or Microsoft, as some murmurs went, but Facebook.
Lyons, incidentally, is the writer behind The Secret Diary of Steve Jobs, a sharp-witted blog pretending to be written by Apple's CEO. Lyons used to go by Fake Steve Jobs, but The New York Times outed him in 2007. (The blog is on hiatus out of respect for Jobs, who is on medical leave.)
"The mess, seemingly worthy of a Nixon re-election campaign, is embarrassing for Facebook, which has struggled at times to brand itself as trustworthy. But even more so for Burson-Marsteller, a huge PR firm that has represented lots of blue-chip corporate clients in its 58-year history," Lyons wrote in the Daily Beast, a website owned by the same company as Newsweek.
And so, people got a rare glimpse inside Facebook's thorny relationship with Google in a story that seems more befitting to behind-the-scenes Washington politics or rival pizza joints than the sparring between two seemingly friendly tech giants.
It was also a good lesson on privacy in an age in which few things stay out of the public eye.
"Odds are that if you are writing about something controversial, or doing something controversial, someone is going to leak it," said Smith, the crisis-management expert.
Google and Facebook are Silicon Valley neighbors with similar scrappy roots as startups.
Over the past few years, however, they have grown more competitive. Google is dominant in advertising that accompanies search results, but Facebook has the potential to draw ad dollars with its extensive knowledge of people's interests and social circles. With little success, Google has urged Facebook to make its data more accessible to its search engine.
Facebook also has successfully lured scores of Google's engineers and executives, a key reason Google gave its staff a 10 percent raise this year.
The PR fiasco was prompted by Google's Social Circle, which is part of the company's efforts to supplement search results with content from your Facebook, Twitter and other online connections.
Facebook, no stranger to privacy mishaps, criticizes Google for collecting and storing Internet users' information without their knowledge or consent.
But even the most ardent privacy advocates are dubious Google is doing anything all that bad with Social Circle.
Marc Rotenberg, executive director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center, said there are far more pressing privacy issues. They include Google's mapping service with street-level photography and Facebook's tendency to encourage people to share more than they think they're sharing. EPIC also objects to the tracking of people's location through mobile devices.
Facebook acknowledges that it could have handled the matter better.
"The issues are serious and we should have presented them in a serious and transparent way," the company said.
Google did not respond to messages for comment. Nor did Mercurio and Jim Goldman, the Burson-Marsteller employees behind the Facebook campaign. The blogger, Soghoian, confirmed the email exchange and said, "I don't write things for other people."
Lyons would not disclose how he figured out the identity of Burson-Marsteller's mystery client. As for Facebook's response that it didn't intend a smear campaign, he only wrote:
"I don't think there's any reason not to take them at their word, right? Oh wait."
---
Online:
Soghoian's posting of the emails: http://pastebin.com/zaeTeJeJ
Google's Social Circle (requires a Google account to see your own connections):
http://www.google.com/s2/search/social 


....................

Note: The viewpoint expressed in this article is solely that of the writer / news outlet. "FATA Awareness Initiative" Team may not agree with the opinion presented.
....................

We Hope You find the info useful. Keep visiting this blog and remember to leave your feedback / comments / suggestions / requests / corrections.
With Regards,
"FATA Awareness Initiative" Team.

Thursday, May 12, 2011

Raj Rajaratnam: Wiretaps key in conviction of ex-hedge fund giant (Associated Press, 12 May 2011)

Courtesy: "Associated Press", 12 May 2011
Wiretaps key in conviction of ex-hedge fund giant

NEW YORK (AP) -- The jury that returned a guilty verdict to all charges against a one-time billionaire hedge fund founder proved to have a voracious appetite for the audiotapes of him talking to fellow traders and friends at public companies about stocks he wanted to trade.
Before they returned the verdict Wednesday against Raj Rajaratnam, jurors listened to 66 taped conversations over 12 days. They heard some of the 45 conversations played during the trial multiple times, enabling prosecutors to declare their maiden effort to use wiretaps to prosecute insider trading cases a huge success. Legal observers agreed.
The office of U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara "took wiretaps for a test drive, and I'd say it was a resounding success," said Stephen Miller, a former federal prosecutor in private practice in Philadelphia.
The tapes were "a gold mine," said Steven Scholes, an attorney in private practice in Chicago who formerly worked in the Securities and Exchange Commission Division of Enforcement. "There's an old saying that you can't cross-examine a tape," he said.
Kenneth Herzinger, another former attorney in the SEC enforcement division, predicted prosecutors will expand the use of wiretaps to other white-collar prosecutions.
"I view the use of wiretaps as a game changer and something that certainly the defense bar has taken notice of and I think that Wall Street has taken notice of," said Herzinger, now a San Francisco attorney in private practice.
But the success of the wiretaps might make some insider trading cases that lack them harder to prosecute, said Rita Glavin, a former federal prosecutor now in private practice.
"It's powerful evidence; you can't deny your words on tape," she said. "Jurors may expect in the future for all insider trading cases to hear wiretaps. If you don't have wiretaps, the government now is going to be at a disadvantage."
The jury convicted Rajaratnam of all 14 counts: five of conspiracy and nine of securities fraud, after relying on the tapes, where the Sri Lankan-born 53-year-old could be heard wheeling and dealing with corrupt executives and consultants - in one case demanding "radio silence" on information that could affect a stock price.
The tapes spelled the demise of a defendant who "was among the best and the brightest, one of the most educated, successful and privileged professionals in the country," Bharara said in a statement. "Yet, like so many others, he let greed and corruption cause his undoing."
Authorities have said the recordings represent the most extensive use to date of wiretaps in a white-collar case. The defense had fought hard in pretrial hearings to keep the evidence out of the trial by arguing that the FBI obtained it with a faulty warrant.
Once a judge allowed the recordings in, prosecutors put them to maximum use by repeatedly playing them for jurors.
Prosecutors had alleged that illegal tips allowed Rajaratnam to make profits and avoid losses totaling more than $60 million. His Galleon Group funds, they said, became a multibillion-dollar success at the expense of ordinary stock investors who didn't have the advance notice he enjoyed of mergers, acquisitions and earnings reports.
On Wednesday, Rajaratnam sat at the defense table, a rarity for him at the trial, and stayed motionless as the verdict was read. Most days, he took an uncustomary position on a bench behind his lawyers.
U.S. District Judge Richard Holwell ruled that Rajaratnam could remain free on $100 million bail as long as he was placed under house arrest at his Manhattan home to await sentencing July 29. Prosecutors said he faces a possible prison term of roughly 16 to 19 years under federal sentencing guidelines. Financial penalties have yet to be determined.
Outside court, with Rajaratnam at his side, defense attorney John Dowd said an appeal will be filed.
The verdict followed seven weeks of testimony. Some of the people who were recorded talking to Rajaratnam pleaded guilty and testified against him.
The defense had argued that the tapes revealed nothing more than that Rajaratnam was doing his duty by asking questions about information already circulating in the "real world" of high finance.
"That happens every day on Wall Street," Dowd told the jury. "There's nothing wrong with it."
In one July 29, 2008, call, Rajaratnam could be heard grilling former Goldman Sachs board member Rajat Gupta about whether the board had discussed acquiring a commercial bank or an insurance company.
"Have you heard anything along that line?" Rajaratnam asked Gupta.
"Yeah," Gupta responded. "This was a big discussion at the board meeting."
Prosecutors sought to maximize the impact of the Gupta tape by calling Goldman Sachs chairman Lloyd Blankfein to testify that the phone call violated the investment bank's confidentiality policies. Gupta, who has not been charged, has denied wrongdoing.
The government also played tapes it said proved Rajaratnam was trading secrets and orchestrating cover-ups with fellow hedge fund manager Danielle Chiesi, who pleaded guilty in the case.
"This stock could go up $10, you know? But we got to keep this radio silence," Rajaratnam said in one tape.
"Oh, please. That is my pleasure," Chiesi responded.
"Not even to your little boyfriends, you know?"
"No, believe me, I don't have friends," she replied.
Rajaratnam advised Chiesi to buy 1 million shares of a tech stock on an inside tip, then sell 500,000 of those shares - a tactic prosecutors say was used to throw regulators off the trail. In another instance, about 30 minutes of calls with an Intel tipster scored Rajaratnam a $2 million windfall on the computer chip-maker's stock, prosecutors said.
Former financial consultant Anil Kumar testified that he and Rajaratnam - his former classmate at the University of Pennsylvania's prestigious Wharton School - broke the law by speaking regularly about the negotiations over the acquisition of ATI Technologies Inc. by Kumar's client, Advanced Micro Devices Inc., before the deal was announced.
"I told him that this was `red hot' and shouldn't be discussed," Kumar said. Later, he said he cautioned the defendant, "This is going to be a complete shock to the industry ... so treat this with the strictest of confidence."
Prosecutors say Rajaratnam raked in $20 million by trading on his advance notice of the ATI-AMD deal. Afterward, he called Kumar at home and said, "You're a star," Kumar told the jury.
When Rajaratnam later informed Kumar that he would be rewarded with a $1 million kickback, "I almost fell off my chair," the witness said.
Rajaratnam was charged in October 2009, days before Galleon, which had up to $7 billion in assets under management, announced that it was shutting down its hedge funds.
The Galleon probe has resulted in more than two dozen arrests and 21 guilty pleas. It also has led to a second investigation aimed at consultants in the securities industry who pass off inside information as the product of legitimate research.
Only Rajaratnam has gone to trial, where he relived conversations that the insiders never suspected were being monitored. On one tape, Rajaratnam sounded sheepish when one particularly effusive tipster praised him for being a star in the hedge fund universe.
"The myth," Rajaratnam said, "is larger than the reality."
---
Follow Larry Neumeister at http://twitter.com/Lneumeister

....................
Note: The viewpoint expressed in this article is solely that of the writer / news outlet. "FATA Awareness Initiative" Team may not agree with the opinion presented.
....................

We Hope You find the info useful. Keep visiting this blog and remember to leave your feedback / comments / suggestions / requests / corrections.
With Regards,
"FATA Awareness Initiative" Team.

Facebook Seeks to Downplay Campaign Against Google (New York Times, 12 May 2011)

Courtesy: "New York Times", 12 May 2011
Facebook Seeks to Downplay Campaign Against Google
By MIGUEL HELFT
The war between Silicon Valley’s best-known rivals has just escalated a notch.
Facebook on Thursday sought to minimize negative publicity over revelations that it had hired a high-profile public relations firm to plant negative stories in major media outlets about its archrival,  Google.
The Daily Beast reported that Facebook had hired Burson Marsteller, which worked for Hillary Rodham Clinton’s presidential bid in 2008, to persuade reporters and privacy advocates to write stories critical of a new Google service, Social Circles. But the effort backfired after a prominent privacy advocate and frequent Google critic, Christopher Soghoian, said the service did not violate privacy and published his e-mail exchange with Burson.
In the e-mails, a Burson representative writes that Social Circles is “designed to scrape private data and build deeply personal dossiers on millions of users — in a direct and flagrant violation” of Google’s agreement with the Federal Trade Commission. At one point, the Burson representative refused to disclose its client.
In an interview, Mr. Soghoian described Social Circles as innocuous from a privacy perspective and criticized Facebook, which has been dogged by a long series of privacy problems.
“For Facebook to raise the privacy issue, they have to hide behind P.R. people,” Mr. Soghoian said. “Google is a major offender on privacy. But this particular issue is not a big deal.”
Social Circles tries to personalize search results by adding items your friends have liked on various social sites.
Facebook denied that the company had engaged in a “smear campaign” and said that it was simply trying to bring what it believed was a privacy problem to the attention of reporters and privacy advocates. In a statement, it said:
“No ’smear’ campaign was authorized or intended. Instead, we wanted third parties to verify that people did not approve of the collection and use of information from their accounts on Facebook and other services for inclusion in Google Social Circles — just as Facebook did not approve of use or collection for this purpose. We engaged Burson-Marsteller to focus attention on this issue, using publicly available information that could be independently verified by any media organization or analyst. The issues are serious and we should have presented them in a serious and transparent way.”
The Burson campaign, which included two high-profile former journalists, Jim Goldman of CNBC and John Mercurio, a former political reporter, also pitched USA TODAY.
Google did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

....................
Note: The viewpoint expressed in this article is solely that of the writer / news outlet. "FATA Awareness Initiative" Team may not agree with the opinion presented.
...................

We Hope You find the info useful. Keep visiting this blog and remember to leave your feedback / comments / suggestions / requests / corrections.
With Regards,
"FATA Awareness Initiative" Team.

Thinking the unthinkable on Europe's debt crisis: Spain is Next (Reuters, 12 May 2011)

Courtesy: "Reuters", 12 May 2011
Analysis: Thinking the unthinkable on Europe's debt crisis
By Luke Baker
BRUSSELS
(Reuters) - There is a solution to Europe's debt crisis. It's called proper fiscal and political union. The only problem is Germany, France, Austria, Finland, the Netherlands and quite a few others would never accept it.
For well over a year, Europe's leaders have been coming up with bold, multi-billion-euro measures to try to put a stop to the debt rot eating away at Greece, Ireland and Portugal, and which could soon affect other member states such as Spain.
The net result, especially when looked at through the eyes of the financial markets, is no improvement. Greece and the others are no closer to resolving their problems, and the likelihood of a debt default or restructuring has only risen.
For their next move, euro zone leaders are expected to decide to extend the maturities on 110 billion euros of loans already granted to Greece, could lower the interest rate, and may come up with a further package of support.
The terms of Ireland's bailout could also soon be altered, and if Portugal finds itself unable to make progress on fiscal reforms, its package could be tinkered with in time too.
From the markets' point of view, the situation is unsustainable. The debts of Greece, Ireland and Portugal just keep rising as a proportion of GDP, and there is little prospect of them financing themselves in the markets for years to come.
As a result, the euro zone will have to keep providing them with emergency loans to tide them over -- effectively lending them more money to try to overcome their bad debts -- or the debts will have to be restructured, with potentially deep repercussions for Europe's banking system and wider economy.
"There's no one silver bullet. There's no one optimal solution," said Janis Emmanouilidis, a senior policy analyst at the European Policy Center who studies the crisis.
"Policymakers are having to decide between multiple, unpleasant, sub-optimal solutions."
The likelihood, given the immense political constraints on taking more radical, far-reaching solutions, is that the euro zone will stick to its current course of action and do whatever it can to avoid the prospect of a debt restructuring or default.
But one potential solution -- and something economic historians say the euro zone will have to move toward in the decades to come if it is to be a strong and enduring single currency union -- is fuller political and fiscal integration.
The alternative could be countries dropping out of the euro zone, as reports last week suggested Greece was considering.
HISTORY TO CONSIDER
From the start, since the formation of the European Coal and Steel Community in 1958, the body which ultimately morphed into the European Union, the European project has been about avoiding conflict, sharing risk and moving toward closer cooperation.
When the euro was introduced for 11 EU countries in 2002, it was a logical next step in a now more than 50-year process of economic integration. With 17 of the EU's 27 states now in the euro, the single currency is one of the region's greatest achievements.
But despite its successes, the euro has not brought with it the depth of macroeconomic and fiscal coordination that some of its early architects envisaged.
Greece's economy is hardly comparable to Germany's; Portugal's bears little resemblance to Finland's. In those differences, and the debt and deficit imbalances they have wrought, lies the seat of the sovereign debt crisis.
If there were tighter political and fiscal integration, with the euro zone one unified economy, the argument goes, it would be in a much better position to weather its current distress.
Average euro zone debt as a proportion of GDP is just over 80 percent, a much more manageable level than Greece's, at near 150 percent or Ireland's, which is above 120 percent.
If the euro zone issued bonds collectively -- an idea that has been proposed, dismissed out of hand by Germany and others, but which has not entirely gone away -- then markets would still be buying the debt, not driving yields higher, traders say.
In an analysis last month, comparing the euro zone crisis to similar problems in the U.S. banking system in the 19th century, Adalbert Winkler, a professor of finance at Franfurt's School of Finance and Management, concluded:
"A substantially more comprehensive economic union might be needed to stabilize the euro area... Already in 1990 the Bundesbank argued that a political union might be a prerequisite for the smooth functioning of European monetary union."
The problem -- as economists, EU policymakers and market participants know -- is that it is politically near-impossible.
Not only would it mean surrendering sovereignty -- few issues are more sovereign than collecting taxes and running and financing a budget -- but it would be the bailout to end all bailouts: wealthy central and northern European countries such as Germany and the Netherlands quite literally assume the collective debts and risks of the likes of Portugal and Greece.
"It would mean denouncing your own country and there is way too much nationalism at this point for that idea to get anywhere close to reality," said Mark Grant, managing director of structured debt at Southwest Securities in Florida.
"To provide aid on a case-by-case basis is one thing. To turn your sovereignty over to Brussels is quite another."
It would also mean that those countries "rescued" in the euro zone safety net would face no incentive to overhaul their economies to make themselves more competitive and grow. They would be more likely to go on as they have done, knowing they are protected under the euro zone banner.
That is the very reason Germany, Finland and others are adamant that strong "conditionality" is attached to the bailout loans to Greece, Ireland and Portugal.
Yet even if the whole idea of deeper fiscal and political union is unthinkable for a decade or more, the long-term trend for the euro zone points in that direction. As Portuguese Prime Minister Jose Socrates said this week:
"The European project faces a challenge, and this challenge has to be answered by deepening the European project...The common currency is defended by deepening economic integration. It's best if we all work together."

(Editing by Ralph Buolton)
....................

Note: The viewpoint expressed in this article is solely that of the writer / news outlet. "FATA Awareness Initiative" Team may not agree with the opinion presented.
....................

We Hope You find the info useful. Keep visiting this blog and remember to leave your feedback / comments / suggestions / requests / corrections.
With Regards,
"FATA Awareness Initiative" Team.

India: Delhi's Waste to Energy Project Not So Green (Inter Press Service)

Courtesy: "Inter Press Service", 11 May 2011
Waste to Energy Project Not So Green 
By Ranjit Devraj
NEW DELHI, May 11, 2011 (IPS) - A waste-to-energy (WtE) project in the heart of the Indian capital and run by a powerful industrial family is testing the enforceability of the country’s environmental and zoning laws.
The WtE project, being promoted by Jindal Ecopolis—owned by the Jindal family that is close to the ruling Congress party—will, when fully operational, burn 4,000 tonnes a day of refuse derived fuel (RDF) made from municipal waste, to produce 20 megawatts of electricity.
Like many dirty industries rapidly coming up across the Indian landscape, Jindal’s WtE project may have gone unremarked, except that it is located in the Okhla area of South Delhi, reckoned as among the most affluent of India’s 604 districts and populated by people acutely aware of their rights.
Environmentalists say the plant has violated zoning regulations, the Delhi Master Plan, rulings by the Supreme Court and rules laid down by the Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) and the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), a statutory body.

Ravi Agarwal, director of Toxics Link, a leading environment group specialising in solid waste management, said because the Jindal WtE project is the first plant of its type in India, it will serve as a model for other Indian cities to follow.
"This has serious implications for the future of the urban waste sector in this country," he told IPS.
Even before Delhi State Chief Minister Sheila Dikshit laid the foundation stone for the plant in July 2010, residents of Okhla, which has a population of 1.5 million people, had filed public interest litigation in the Delhi High Court protesting several gross violations.
In published guidelines, titled "Management of Municipal Solid Waste," the CPCB has specifically cautioned local bodies "Not to adopt expensive technologies of power generation, fuel pelletisation, incineration etc. until they are proven under Indian conditions by the Government of India (GoI) or expert agencies nominated by the GoI."
After visiting the plant on Apr. 1, in response to mass rallies and protests by Okhla residents, MoEF minister Jairam Ramesh wrote to Dikshit pointing out two grave violations: the failure of the state government to hold adequate public consultations and Jindal Ecopolis’ failure to seek mandatory clearance from the CPCB.
Last week, however, Ramesh confessed to helplessness in enforcing green laws on major development projects.
"Regularisation of illegality is a peculiar Indian characteristic. First you make the law and then break the law," Ramesh said, venting frustration while addressing a management conference in the capital last week.
Ramesh, who has degrees in engineering and management from the Indian Institute of Technology-Bombay, Carnegie Mellon University and Massachusetts Institute of Technology, said he is often forced to "regularise irregularity" because the offending project had already come up.
"I am guilty of condoning many environmental violations," Ramesh said with a candidness rare for an Indian minister.
In May, Ramesh’s ministry granted environmental clearances to such controversial projects as a 12-billion-dollar steel plant and port being built by the South Korean Pohang Steel Company in eastern Orissa state, and a nuclear power park in Jaitapur in western Maharashtra state under construction in a 15-billion-dollar deal with the French state-owned Areva.
Ramesh had earlier observed that Jindal’s WtE plant would be hard to stop or relocate because it was close to completion. But, under pressure from the Okhla community, he ordered a technical review by the CPCB and made the grant of an "operating license" conditional on the outcome.
To his credit, Ramesh allowed the residents to nominate two independent experts—Toxics Link’s Agarwal and another highly qualified technology consultant, Anant Trivedi—to participate in the technical review the CPCB conducted on Apr. 26.
Agarwal and Trivedi pointed out startling anomalies to the 23 expert participants of the review exercise, who included the chief of Jindal Ecopolis, Allard Nooyi, and Jurgen Porst from the German consultant Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) which collaborates with the Indian environment ministry and advises it.
A presentation made by Nooyi was so elementary that it resulted in the CPCB chairman S.P. Gautam calling for "technical details rather than project outlines." In a formal statement, the CPCB demanded that Jindal Ecopolis provide "realistic figures on quantities of residues and other waste streams generated and complete details of control facilities."
GIZ representatives said that the disposal of fly ash and other residue needed to be studied, besides the impact of transportation of waste on the environment. They were also concerned that Jindal Ecopolis did not have a disaster management plan.
Agarwal said, "We pointed out that there was no baseline data on the use of WtE technology in India and that the Supreme Court had ruled in 2007 that only pilot projects on research and development mode can be allowed."
"It became painfully clear that Jindal Ecopolis does not have technology clearance from CPCB, no valid environment impact assessment, and has never bothered to engage the community in public consultations as mandated by law," Trivedi told IPS.
"From the project costing it was clear that Jindal has no viable plans to remove toxic pollutants and plans to discharge effluents into the already polluted Yamuna River," he added. "The fact that the Asian Development Bank has dropped it from its Asia Pacific Carbon Fund speaks volumes for how green the project is."
Trivedi said that with so many blatant violations it was hard to see how the environment ministry could grant the WtE plant an operating license unless additional investments worth millions of dollars are made by July, when it is due to be inaugurated.
"We expect to know shortly whether Ramesh’s ministry and the CPCB have turned into rubber stamps for patently illegal projects being pushed by powerful industrial lobbies, Indian or international," Trivedi said.


....................

Note: The viewpoint expressed in this article is solely that of the writer / news outlet. "FATA Awareness Initiative" Team may not agree with the opinion presented.
....................

We Hope You find the info useful. Keep visiting this blog and remember to leave your feedback / comments / suggestions / requests / corrections.
With Regards,
"FATA Awareness Initiative" Team.

United Nations to Host World Summit on Nuclear Safety (Inter Press Service)

Courtesy: "Inter Press Service", 11 May 2011
U.N. to Host World Summit on Nuclear Safety
By Thalif Deen
UNITED NATIONS, May 11, 2011 (IPS) - The severity of the recent nuclear accident at the Fukushima Daiichi power plant in Japan has prompted U.N. Secretary- General Ban Ki-moon to convene a high-level meeting of world leaders on a politically-sensitive issue: nuclear security.
"We have to reevaluate nuclear risks and nuclear safety in response to the disaster in Japan," he told reporters Wednesday.
The meeting, scheduled to take place during the upcoming session of the General Assembly on Sep. 22, is expected to focus on strengthening the global nuclear safety regime and ensuring maximum nuclear safety standards.
"This requires in-depth analysis on design, construction, training, quality assurance systems and stringent regulatory mechanisms," the secretary-general said.

This exercise, he said, will also need a serious global debate on broader issues, including assessment of the costs, risks and benefits of nuclear energy and stronger connections between nuclear safety, nuclear security and nuclear non-proliferation.
The damage to the nuclear power plant in Japan, which followed a devastating earthquake and tsunami last March, resulted in radioactive contamination threatening lives and causing a mass exodus of residents in and around the neighbourhood.
The last major nuclear accident was the 1986 Chernobyl disaster, whose radioactive fallout caused a catastrophe in several European countries, with the most affected being Belarus, the Ukraine and Russia.
The United Nations has placed the Fukushima accident on par with Chernobyl.
Asked if the high-level meeting will bolster the global campaign for nuclear disarmament, John Burroughs, executive director of the Lawyers Committee on Nuclear Policy, told IPS that nuclear disarmament will be at least implicitly on the agenda for the September meeting on nuclear safety.
He said the meeting will seek to prevent Fukushima-type nuclear reactor disasters, and focus on nuclear security and the prevention of non-state extremist acquisition of fissile materials for nuclear weapons.
"That's because many non-nuclear weapon states are resistant to the imposition of more onerous standards on safety and security while a two-tier system persists in which only a few countries have nuclear weapons and nationally-controlled nuclear fuel production facilities," Burroughs said.
Of course, he said, all will support safety standards that really make sense. "No country wants to experience a Fukushima or Chernobyl- type catastrophe," he said.
But enthusiasm for global regulation diminishes when sought within a highly discriminatory system, he pointed out.
The secretary-general, who has consistently maintained that "a world free of nuclear weapons is one of my top priorities," said he has called for a U.N. system-wide study on the implications of the accident at Fukushima.
The study will also look at how the international community can better deal with the emerging nexus between natural disasters and nuclear safety.
He said the September meeting will build on next month's ministerial conference of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in Vienna that will address measures needed to enhance nuclear safety in the wake of Fukushima.
While supporting the IAEA initiative, he said, the high-level meeting in September will also provide a bridge to the second Nuclear Security Summit next year in Seoul.
He also pointed out that 2011 marks the 15th year of the Moscow Declaration on Nuclear Safety and Security. The Moscow summit took place in April 1996, on the tenth anniversary of Chernobyl.
"Twenty-five years after Chernobyl and in the aftermath of Fukushima, I believe it is high time to take a hard look at the issue of strengthening nuclear safety and security," Ban told reporters Wednesday.
Asked about the relationship between nuclear security and nuclear disarmament, M.V. Ramana, an associate research scholar with the Programme on Science and Global Security at Princeton University, told IPS, "I do not think that an emphasis on nuclear security alone - i.e., just ensuring that fissile material isn't stolen - will accelerate nuclear disarmament."
He said it is the elimination of nuclear weapons on a non- discriminatory universal basis that is needed.
"However, that process will likely be set back by any large scale expansion of nuclear power," said Ramana, author of several books, including "Prisoner of the Nuclear Dream" and "Bombing Bombay? Effects of Nuclear Weapons and a Case Study of a Hypothetical Explosion".
"I personally think that safety and security are quite different," Ramana said. Both are important, but they have to be engaged with separately.
Further, in the context of nuclear safety, "I think it is very important to involve people who are independent of nuclear establishments around the world in the process, in addition to organisations like the IAEA."
Ban said he has been telling world leaders that while the responsibility for nuclear safety rests with individual governments, they should revisit their nuclear safety standards. "All this strengthening of nuclear standards should be coordinated and done at the national and international level," he said.
He also highlighted the nexus between security and safety.
"We have to be very careful, very vigilant, against any possibility that nuclear materials or nuclear technology could be slipped into the hands of the wrong person, wrong country or wrong organisation, namely terrorist groups, or any country whose regime would be not be committed to international peace and security," Ban said.
"That is why I am raising this issue very seriously," he declared. 


....................
Note: The viewpoint expressed in this article is solely that of the writer / news outlet. "FATA Awareness Initiative" Team may not agree with the opinion presented.
....................

We Hope You find the info useful. Keep visiting this blog and remember to leave your feedback / comments / suggestions / requests / corrections.
With Regards,
"FATA Awareness Initiative" Team.

Analysis: Wild swings in oil prices likely to persist (Reuters, 12 May 2011)

Courtesy: "Reuters", 12 May 2011
Analysis: Wild swings in oil prices likely to persist

LONDON
(Reuters) - Wild swings in oil prices will continue for months to come, after volatility hit a two-year high this week, as trading is increasingly dominated by relative newcomers to the market.
Oil and other commodities markets have gone on a rollercoaster ride since May 5, reacting wildly to economic, currency and inventory data.
"It will persist until the end of the year, and there will be more violent swings in both directions," said Angelos Damaskos, chief executive officer of Sector Investment Managers, which manages the Junior Oils Trust and the Junior Gold Trust. "It will be the fourth quarter before we see more stability."
Close-to-close volatility for the world's two crude oil benchmarks, North Sea Brent and U.S. light crude, known as West Texas Intermediate or WTI, has rocketed to well over 60 percent after two years of declining price moves.
Fund managers and analysts say the heightened volatility reflects increased levels of retail investment and speculation in the commodities markets as exchange-traded products provide easy access for investors with little experience.
"We are seeing a lot of less skilled commodity investors who come in and will hop on a trend," said a UK-based commodity hedge fund manager who asked not to be named.
"When there is a small news event that triggers a correction, either they'll misinterpret it or the trend will temporarily change, there will be a bit of a dip, and they will quickly sell out on that."
"ON THE SIDELINES"
Michael Korn, president of Princeton, New Jersey-based over-the-counter broking house Skokie Energy, said volatility was being encouraged by very large sums of money being deployed by fund managers and non-professional investors.
"The funds being wielded have been growing," Korn said. "It seems like every two to three months we have a new record in speculative open length."
Carl Larry, director of derivatives trading and research at Blue Ocean Brokerage, said there were huge sums of money moving around very quickly, some being invested by people with little experience, and that this was prompting physical traders to sit out during very rapid price moves.
"Physical traders are definitely on the sidelines until the volatility stops," Larry said.
"We're losing any participation from commercial traders trying to get caught in these over-extended moves. When you take that stop gap out of the market, all you are left with is a bunch of funds dictating direction," he said.
Increased futures volatility is also keeping traditional players such as physical traders on the sidelines, making it difficult for them to hedge their supply and demand requirements.
Last week investor sentiment changed due to doubts about global growth as China raised interest rates. That followed several months of worries over the loss of oil supply from the Middle East and North Africa as civil war in Libya shut down exports.
Crude oil fell more than $20 per barrel last week, with North Sea Brent tumbling to a low of almost $105 before a partial recovery, but prices have continued slide this week with total daily price moves of up to 8.5 percent.
SYSTEMATIC TRADING
Higher margin requirements for oil and silver on the CME
futures exchange have also forced speculators to adjust their positions, adding to choppiness.
Fund managers also pointed the finger at systematic trading, which triggers stop-losses when technical levels are breached.
Nigol Koulajian, chief investment officer of commodity trading adviser Quest Partners, said market reversals are getting faster in oil and grains, a by-product of too many people trading the same type of strategy.
"When the market is going up, you get a positive feedback loop, so the price gets reinforced as people add to their positions. But when the market corrects, everyone is running out the door at the same time," he said.
Koulajian said this was much stronger than it used to be as there are more people trading on the technicals.
Investors see no reason why the extraordinary volatility should not continue as worries about the end of quantitative easing, the euro zone debt crisis and inflation combine.
Koulajian said quantitative easing had encouraged investors to buy commodities in order to preserve their savings.
"The liquidity in commodity markets is minute compared to financial markets," said Koulajian. Even a small shift in assets from financial to commodity markets will therefore result in substantial swings in commodity prices, he said.
"We are only in the beginning stages of this shift and we expect much more volatility and price increases ahead."


(Editing by Jane Baird)

....................
Note: The viewpoint expressed in this article is solely that of the writer / news outlet. "FATA Awareness Initiative" Team may not agree with the opinion presented.
....................

We Hope You find the info useful. Keep visiting this blog and remember to leave your feedback / comments / suggestions / requests / corrections.
With Regards,
"FATA Awareness Initiative" Team.

Wednesday, May 11, 2011

Microsoft deal should vastly expand reach of Skype (Associated Press, 10 May 2011)

Courtesy: "Associated Press", 10 May 2011
Microsoft deal should vastly expand reach of Skype

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) -- Imagine using your Xbox and switching from a game to a video chat with a faraway friend holding an iPad. Or going into your office email to invite Grandma to a virtual family reunion beamed on TV sets to relatives across the country.
Microsoft's $8.5 billion purchase of Skype is supposed to make using the Internet for video phone calls as common as logging on to Facebook or instant messaging is today.
If it wins regulatory approval, the deal announced Tuesday provides Microsoft, the world's largest software maker, with the means to sell more digital advertising and offer more popular conferencing tools to help businesses save money.

Skype's services also span hot markets - online socializing, mobile phones and digital video - where Microsoft has been struggling to catch up with Facebook, Apple and Google.
Analysts and investors couldn't seem to agree whether Microsoft is wasting its money on an unprofitable service or has pulled off a coup that will help it restore clout. Microsoft stock was virtually unchanged, falling 0.6 percent.
About 170 million people worldwide who use Skype regularly for calls and chats. Microsoft believes it can attract hundreds of millions more by weaving Skype into its products. Not just Windows, which runs on eight of every 10 computers and servers on the planet, but also its Outlook email program, software for phones and the Xbox video game console.
Microsoft already has a Skype-like service called Windows Live. But the real Skype is far more popular and bridges different computers and phones. Already, someone using the Skype application on an iPhone can talk to someone who has it installed on a Dell laptop.
For businesses, Microsoft has separate communications software. Building Skype into it would make it easier for corporate users to conduct video chats with people at other companies, or from home, said Bern Elliott, an analyst at the research firm Gartner Inc.
Skype allows users to make voice and video calls for free or pennies. Calls from one Skype account to another are free. Those to a landline or cellphone using the regular phone network cost money, but much less than going through the phone company.
It has become a popular way to avoid large phone bills. Skype is the largest provider of international calling services in the world, surpassing any single phone company, according to research firm TeleGeography.
Skype users made 207 billion minutes of voice and video calls last year - almost 400,000 years' worth. Most of that was free, which has made it difficult for Skype to make money. Only about 5 percent of active Skype users pay for it.
Microsoft pledged to keep Skype in all the places it is currently available, including mobile devices that run of the software of two major rivals, Apple and Google. Skype users don't have to pay to install the software on Apple's iPhone, iPad computer tablet or devices running on Google's Android system.
The new ownership probably means more advertising in Skype's video services along with potentially compelling new uses. Skype only recently began experimenting with ads. Microsoft, which has a much larger sales team, intends to expand them.
The partnership would also bring Skype to the Xbox video game console and has sold 50 million copies, making it the world's No. 2 video game system behind the Nintendo Wii.
Already, players using the Kinect motion-sensing controllers can videoconference with each other. The Microsoft-Skype partnership means a player could one day put a game aside and use the Xbox to call anyone else who has registered for a Skype account - a grandmother on her landline phone, a friend holding an Android phone, a coworker using Outlook email at work.
It's also conceivable that Microsoft could expand Skype's video chatting services into Facebook, the social networking site that has more than 500 million users of its own. Microsoft owns a 1.6 percent stake in Facebook, and both have an interest in cutting into Google's power.
Microsoft's pursuit of Skype may have even been motivated by a desire to make sure Google didn't buy it first, said technology analyst Rob Enderle. He believes Microsoft will plug Skype into Facebook.
"Either Microsoft or Google could turn Skype into an international standard," Enderle said. "Microsoft didn't want to be at the other end of that - that's why it got as pricey as it did."
The purchase is the most expensive in Microsoft's 36-year history, eclipsing its $6 billion acquisition of online ad service aQuantive in 2007. That deal has helped Microsoft sell more online ads, although analysts aren't convinced it was worth the money. The $8.5 billion is also more than three times what Skype was valued at 18 months ago when an earlier owner, eBay Inc., sold a two-thirds stake to a group of investors led by the private equity firm Silver Lake.
When eBay bought Skype for $2.6 billion in 2005, it saw tremendous potential to bring together the millions of buyers and sellers in its online bazaar. But "Skyping" and shopping didn't fit together the way eBay envisioned, feeding the skepticism about whether Microsoft will be able to realize its ambitions.
"The onus is on Microsoft to execute with this deal," said Morningstar analyst Sunit Gogia. "It's really hard ... for shareholders to be optimistic at this price point."
Although it makes billions of dollars selling software for personal computers, Microsoft has struggled badly in its effort to become a bigger force on the Internet. In the past six years, Microsoft's online division has lost more than $7.2 billion.
Skype has lost money consistently since its inception in 2003, mostly because it charges only a small fraction of its users. As a standalone company, Skype lost $7 million on revenue of $860 million last year.
That did not deter Microsoft. We are a super-ambitious company," Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer said. "This Skype acquisition is entirely consistent with our irrepressible, forward-looking nature."
Skype was founded in 2003 by Scandinavian entrepreneurs Janus Friis and Niklas Zennstrom. They also created Kazaa, a file-sharing program that, along with Napster, roiled the music industry a decade ago.
Skype, based in Luxembourg, will become a new business division of Microsoft. Skype's CEO, Tony Bates, will run it and report to Ballmer.
The vast majority of paying Skype users are in Europe, where it's popular among people who want to avoid expensive charges for traditional country-to-country phone calls. In the U.S., calling state to state is comparatively cheap.
Microsoft can easily afford the purchase. At the end of March, it had a cash hoard of $50.2 billion. Because Skype is based overseas, Microsoft plans to pay for the deal from the portion of cash that Microsoft holds overseas to avoid higher taxes in the U.S. The company hopes regulators will approve the Skype takeover before the end of the year.
That's likely. MF Global analyst Paul Gallant said regulators might even view the deal as good for consumers by helping Microsoft compete with Google.
---
Svensson reported from New York and can be reached at http://twitter.com/petersvensson . AP Technology Writers Rachel Metz in San Francisco and Joelle Tessler in Washington contributed to this report.

....................

Note: The viewpoint expressed in this article is solely that of the writer / news outlet. "FATA Awareness Initiative" Team may not agree with the opinion presented.
....................

We Hope You find the info useful. Keep visiting this blog and remember to leave your feedback / comments / suggestions / requests / corrections.
With Regards,
"FATA Awareness Initiative" Team.